When it comes to dimension away from close envy, in the 40 care about-statement tool had been said since the creation of brand new Care about-Declaration and you will Projective Jealousy Bills (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of many instruments were utilized only once. , 1992) designed to evaluate sex differences; the new Multidimensional Jealousy Size (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) developed to measure the three dimensions of jealousy (cognitive, psychological and you can behavioural proportions); the latest Facebook Envy Size (Muise, Christofides, & Des) aimed at researching the probability of a conference that causes thinking regarding envy people regarding its interest with the Twitter; the brand new Jealousy Measure (Buunk, 1997), always glance at around three variety of jealousy (reactive, stressed and preventive) additionally the Interpersonal Jealousy Level (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and this evaluates brand new bad emotion as a consequence of genuine or endangered losses out-of a liked individual a rival.
From inside the Brazil, the latest Personal Envy Catalog are modified (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) In terms of Colombia, there are no psychometric studies away from a particular scale into intimate envy
On the Latin-american framework, discover a type inside Chile of your own Collection regarding Routines of your Couple That can cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). In Mexico, good Multidimensional Measure of Envy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you can a short research try completed with this new Multidimensional Inventory out of Personal Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). On top of that, earlier education did not perform Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) in order to corroborate the latest grounds build found, and reduced precision accounts was indeed utilized in its situations (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or short trials were utilized (Mota mais aussi al., 2016).
The brand new IJS created to have Mathes and you can Severa (1981) is one of the most utilized bills having evaluating personal jealousy, they receive six points you to definitely gauge the sensitiveness to risks relevant to: (a) Partner’s infidelity and dating anybody else (facts 1, step 3, a dozen, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23, and you can twenty-five); (b) Partner’s dominance (items dos, step 3, cuatro, 7, ten, thirteen, 17, 20, and you will 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy lover (activities step one, cuatro, six, 19, and you may 21); (d) Partner’s old dates (points eleven, twenty-four, 26, twenty-seven, and twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (affairs 8, nine and you may 24); and you may (f) Partner’s kept members of the family that have dated schedules and you will sex differences (affairs 5 and you will 18).
All tools in the list above have indicated sufficient degrees of validity and you will reliability
You can find five education with checked with regards dating FilipГnskГЅ dГvky to their accuracy and validity. Mathes and Severa (1981) establish a few training, plus the very first study performed the construction of size that have 39 circumstances, which was reduced to twenty eight issues once mathematical research. After that, during the an extra investigation, IJS was applied close to other scales one examined intimate love-hyperlinks, insecurity, self-esteem and you can an ad hoc questionnaire from independent identities, confirming, considering concept, the sophisticated from jealousy, the better the degree of Close love additionally the smaller new independent term of couple. Within studies, we declaration good coefficient off precision out-of .92 for the complete scale. In a 3rd investigation, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you will Penis (1982), so you can extend the new evidence off authenticity, made use of the IJS and two behavioral measures: (a) threat whenever exposed to an opponent and you will (b) phrases away from possessiveness toward companion, as a consequence of a call that they built to the person who participated in the analysis. The requested correlations was basically received, and this once again served this new legitimacy of one’s level. Finally, into the a 4th study, Mathes, Roter and you will Joerger (1982) substantiated new convergent validity out of IJS along with other balances one to evaluated close jealousy.
